When Rebranding Backfires
- Safa Hachi
- Apr 27
- 3 min read
Rebranding is often positioned as a growth strategy. Whether to modernize a company’s image, reach new audiences, or signal a change in direction. The goals are ambitious and the risks are real. When executed well, a rebrand can strengthen market position. But in the opposite case, even the biggest brands can suffer the consequences of a rebranding failure.
Let’s take a closer look at three high-profile rebranding fails: Tropicana, GAP, and Kraft Dinner. These cases will help us unpack what went wrong and what marketers should take away when considering a rebrand.
The Upside (and Risk) of Rebranding
According to Constant Contact, rebrands can help a business realign with its evolving mission, stand out in a competitive space, or update outdated visuals. However, as Sumy Designs points out, poorly executed rebrands risk diluting brand recognition, disconnecting from loyal customers, and causing confusion around core identity. Rebranding has to be more than cosmetic. It requires strategy, customer insight, and consistency across every touchpoint.
Tropicana (2009): When Packaging Confuses the Customer
In an attempt to modernize its image, Tropicana redesigned its orange juice cartons, replacing its familiar orange-with-a-straw logo with a clean, minimalist glass of juice. The change was too drastic. Customers didn’t recognize the product on shelves, and many felt the new look lacked warmth and familiarity.
Sales fell by 20% in two months, a $30 million loss, forcing the company to revert to its original packaging. Tropicana underestimated how much equity lived in their packaging. The rebrand disrupted recognition at the shelf level and ignored the emotional connection consumers had with the original design.

Photo courtesy of Klint Marketing
GAP (2010): The Six-Day Logo
GAP’s attempt to refresh its brand came out of nowhere. The company introduced a new logo, black Helvetica font with a small blue square in the upper right corner. The rebrand came out of nowhere with no warning or explanation, and the backlash was swift. Designers and consumers criticized it as generic and unmemorable. GAP dropped the rebrand six days later and returned to its original logo.
A sudden, uncontextualized change to a brand's core identity can feel arbitrary and inauthentic. GAP’s rollout lacked customer input and failed to communicate a reason for the shift, resulting in reputational damage and wasted resources.

Kraft Dinner (2015): Familiar Nickname, Unfamiliar Look
In 2009, Kraft attempted a corporate rebrand by redesigning its logo. The goal was to project a more modern, dynamic identity. But instead of refining the existing design, they introduced a completely new logo with multiple colours, a different font, and an abstract “burst” shape. Customers were confused and claimed these elements felt out of place and disconnected from the brand’s legacy.
The new logo didn’t communicate Kraft’s values or heritage and felt overly generic for such a well-established name in grocery aisles. Within six months, Kraft quietly walked it back, opting for a simplified version of the original design with minor tweaks.

Rebranding doesn’t always mean reinventing. Drastic design overhauls can alienate customers and dilute identity, especially when the original brand already holds strong recognition. Sometimes, subtle refinement works better than a full reset.
Should You Rebrand?
A rebrand can:
Modernize your identity
Better reflect your mission or values
Reach new or evolving audiences
But before taking the leap, ask yourself:
Are you solving a problem or creating one?
Will your current audience still feel seen and recognized?
Is your new identity rooted in strategic intent or superficial change?
Have you tested it—visually and emotionally—across your customer base?
Rebranding isn’t inherently good or bad, it’s all about execution. These case studies show that even iconic brands aren’t immune to missteps. You need to remember your brand is more than a logo. It’s a system of trust, memory, and recognition. Changing it too abruptly might risk severing what took years to build.
But with audience insight, clear communication, and brand consistency, a rebrand can still be the right move.
Comments